


|
sponsored by Hewlett-Packard Company
|
|
|
Posted:
|
04 Mar 2009
|
|
Published:
|
04 Mar 2009
|
|
Format:
|
PDF
|
|
Length:
|
14
Page(s)
|
|
Type:
|
Analyst Report
|
|
Language:
|
English
|
|
|
ABSTRACT:
In Forrester's 79-criteria evaluation of requirements management tools vendors, five standalone requirements management tools and four application life-cycle management (ALM) solutions that include requirements management capabilities went head-to-head. Standalone tools fared better on average, but HP Quality Center ranked alongside IBM's Rational RequisitePro in the Leaders circle, and MKS's application life-cycle management solution joined standalone requirements management tools from Borland Software, Compuware, and Telelogic in the Strong Performers category. However, all three of our Contenders - Microsoft, Rally Software Development, and Serena Software - offer requirements management within a larger ALM solution. The availability of mature requirements management capabilities within larger ALM solutions complicates application development organizations' tool-selection process.
This research paper breaks down all the details to allow you to get a complete understanding of how each standalone requirements management tool and application life-cycle management (ALM) solutions fared.
|
|
|
|
 |
BROWSE RELATED
RESOURCES
Application Development | Application Life-Cycle Management | Business Process Management | Change Management | Configuration Management | Performance Testing | Project Management
|
View All Resources
sponsored by Hewlett-Packard Company
|
|
BusinessWeek Technology Research Library Copyright © 1998-2009 Bitpipe, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. TechTarget · 117 Kendrick St · Needham, MA · 02494
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Bitpipe Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. businessweek@bitpipe.com
|